Iris Pro Graphics P555 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.31no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGB206Skylake GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352384
Core clock speed790 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate265.248.00
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs646
TMUs13648
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.41.1.97
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 August 2025 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics P555, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and Iris Pro Graphics P555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P555 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Iris Pro Graphics P555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.