Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Blackwell (2024−2025) | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 March 2025 (less than a year ago) | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3328 | 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | LPDDR5x-8533 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 7.9 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 March 2025 | 30 October 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop has an age advantage of 4 months.
Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop and M4 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop is a notebook card while Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
