Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs RTX A400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking418not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.69no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107Viola
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)7 November 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683840
Core clock speed727 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate42.29564.0
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24240
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length163 mm386 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2024 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 232 Watt

RTX A400 has 364% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 49 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.