Arc Graphics 64EU vs RTX A400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.73no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGA107Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 April 2024 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Core clock speed727 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate42.2960.80
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 April 2024 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 8 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

RTX A400 has 30% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU
Arc Graphics 64EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 38 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A400 or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.