UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs RTX A40

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA102Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1075216
Core clock speed1305 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate589.7no data
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs336no data
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount48 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1812 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm

RTX A40 has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between RTX A40 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A40 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A40 or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.