Radeon Pro 575 vs RTX A40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGA102Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date5 October 2020 (5 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107522048
Core clock speed1305 MHz1096 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate589.7140.3
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs336128
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data
L1 Cache10.5 MB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1812 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 120 Watt

RTX A40 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Pro 575, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A40 and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A40 or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.