GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs RTX A40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.46
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGA102GK107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 October 2020 (5 years ago)12 July 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752384
Core clock speed1305 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate589.728.80
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs11216
TMUs33632
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data
L1 Cache10.5 MB32 KB
L2 Cache6 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount48 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1812 MHz1254 MHz
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/s80.26 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA8.63.0
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 12 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A40 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

GT 650M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A40 and GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A40 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A40 or GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.