GeForce 315M vs RTX A40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.60
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA102GT218
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 October 2020 (5 years ago)5 January 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1075216
Core clock speed1305 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate589.74.848
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs1124
TMUs3368
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data
L1 Cache10.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount48 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1812 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPortDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6+
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 14 Watt

RTX A40 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 315M, on the other hand, has 2043% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A40 and GeForce 315M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A40 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 315M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 175 votes

Rate GeForce 315M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A40 or GeForce 315M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.