Arctic Sound 2T vs RTX A3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.35no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA104Arctic Sound
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40967680 ×2
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1230 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate157.4216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs64120 ×2
TMUs128240 ×2
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L1 Cache4 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 500 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX A3000 Mobile and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 163 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A3000 Mobile or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.