Radeon PRO W9070 vs RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed607 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1177 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate94.16760.3
Floating-point processing power6.026 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs80256
Tensor Cores80128
Ray Tracing Cores2064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 304 Watt

RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB has 220% lower power consumption.

PRO W9070, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB and Radeon PRO W9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon PRO W9070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
AMD Radeon PRO W9070
Radeon PRO W9070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB or Radeon PRO W9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.