Quadro 3000M X2 vs RTX 6000 Ada

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon
X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameAD102EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,349 no data
Current price$155 (0x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18176240
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHzno data
Number of transistors76,300 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate1,42318.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX 6000 Ada and Quadro 3000M X2 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount48 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s2.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.92.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2022 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 150 Watt

We couldn't decide between RTX 6000 Ada and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 6000 Ada is a desktop card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
RTX 6000 Ada
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 62 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.