GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking15not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameAda LovelaceGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 December 2022 (1 year ago)16 June 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 $499
Current price$9290 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18176240
Core clock speed915 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHzno data
Number of transistors76,300 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt289 Watt
Texture fill rate1,42346.08

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type8.9GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount48 GB896 MB
Memory bus width384 bit Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s112.9 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.91.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2022 16 June 2009
Cost $6799 $499
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 289 Watt

We couldn't decide between RTX 6000 Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB
GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 56 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.