VIA Castle Rock vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.64no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD103CLE266
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)1 January 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97283
Core clock speed1425 MHz2 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate643.0no data
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs304no data
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 1 January 2003

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 20 years.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and VIA Castle Rock. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while VIA Castle Rock is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
VIA Castle Rock
Castle Rock

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 69 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate VIA Castle Rock on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or VIA Castle Rock, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.