Tegra 4 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.73no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameAD103Tegra 4
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)1 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9728no data
Core clock speed1425 MHz672 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate643.02.688
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1124
TMUs3044
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 1 August 2013
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 4, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Tegra 4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tegra 4 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Tegra 4
Tegra 4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 69 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Tegra 4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Tegra 4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.