ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking50not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.61no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameAD103M7
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)29 September 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97282
Core clock speed1425 MHz280 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz280 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate643.00.56
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3042
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 29 September 2001
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 27 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 21 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility FireGL 7800, on the other hand, has 344.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Mobility FireGL 7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 69 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Mobility FireGL 7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.