Radeon RX 9060 XT vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD107Navi 44
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)18 May 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1635 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz3230 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate203.0413.4
Floating-point processing power12.99 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96128
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 18 May 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and Radeon RX 9060 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 22 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.