Tesla T4G vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD107TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)13 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed930 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate139.7254.4
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96160
Tensor Cores96320
Ray Tracing Cores2440
L1 Cache3 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache12 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.97.5
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 4 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4G, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and Tesla T4G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla T4G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation or Tesla T4G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.