ROG Ally Extreme GPU vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameAD107Phoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed930 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate139.7129.6
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs9648
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores2412
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache3 MB256 KB
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Lengthno data280 mm
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 13 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

ROG Ally Extreme GPU has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and ROG Ally Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation graphics card while ROG Ally Extreme GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
ROG Ally Extreme GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 41 votes

Rate ROG Ally Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation or ROG Ally Extreme GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.