3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation81.77no data
Power efficiency45.75no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Voodoo Scalable (2000)
GPU code nameAD107VSA-101
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1620 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,900 million14 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate187.40.33
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs882
Tensor Cores88no data
Ray Tracing Cores22no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.