GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.13
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed550 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors302 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2076.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RSX Reality Synthesizer is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 209 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.