GMA X4500 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking444not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.39no data
Architectureno dataGeneration 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameno dataEaglelake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.132
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.0
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2023 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 4 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 354 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GMA X4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.