ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking864not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.60no data
Architectureno dataRage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameno dataRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX128.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 5 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 24 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 690 or Radeon 9000 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.