RSX Reality Synthesizer vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking809not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.27no data
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataRSX-CXD5302
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)4 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data302 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.20
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
OpenGLno dataES 1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 4 October 2012
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 80 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and RSX Reality Synthesizer. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook card while RSX Reality Synthesizer is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 30 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.