Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking854not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.93no data
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speedno data1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rateno data466.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.93 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1625 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data624.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 260 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has an age advantage of 3 months, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 3614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 690 or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.