GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking859not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.54no data
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speedno data1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rateno data88.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.822 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 25 August 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 31 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 690 or GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.