B100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking859not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.99no data
Architectureno dataBlackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)November 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16896 ×2
Core clock speedno data1665 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1837 MHz
Number of transistorsno data104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rateno data969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data24 ×2
TMUsno data528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2
L1 Cacheno data33 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 1000 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 690 has 14185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and B100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook graphics card while B100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690
NVIDIA B100
B100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate B100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 690 or B100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.