Apple M4 20-core GPU vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 861 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.07 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 (7 years ago) | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 20 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 45 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x-8533 |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 8533 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 December 2018 | 30 October 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 45 Watt |
Qualcomm Adreno 690 has 542.9% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 20-core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 690 and M4 20-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 690 is a notebook graphics card while Apple M4 20-core GPU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
