Radeon Instinct MI350P vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking924not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.04no data
Architectureno dataCDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameno dataMI350 128CU
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)7 May 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8192
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data73,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,126.4
Floating-point processing powerno data36.04 TFLOPS
TMUsno data512
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountno data144 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.19 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 7 May 2026
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 600 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has 8471% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI350P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon Instinct MI350P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI350P is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Instinct MI350P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 680 or Radeon Instinct MI350P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.