Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking912not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.41no data
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataLucienne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data60.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.946 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 12 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 25 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Graphics 512SP Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 680 or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.