AeroBox GPU vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.35no data
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameno dataKryptos
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (7 years ago)13 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speedno data935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.16
Floating-point processing powerno data1.765 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1066 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.22 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2018 13 March 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 100 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 43 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 680 or AeroBox GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.