3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking877not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.70no data
Architectureno dataVoodoo Scalable (2000)
GPU code nameno dataVSA-101
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 December 2018 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistorsno data14 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.33
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX126.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook card while 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.