Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics vs Quadro4 900 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1584not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV25 A2Spectre Lite
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 February 2002 (23 years ago)17 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed300 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors63 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data17 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40012.79
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4093 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed325 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R6 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 900 XGL and Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL
AMD Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 900 XGL or Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.