Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs Quadro4 900 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV25 A2TU106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 February 2002 (23 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1920 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors63 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400165.6 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.299 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs8120 ×2
Tensor Coresno data240 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data30 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed325 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

RTX 3000 X2 Mobile has an age advantage of 17 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 900 XGL and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 900 XGL or Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.