Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs Quadro4 750 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV25 A2Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 February 2002 (24 years ago)23 February 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed275 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors63 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2003.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed225 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R1E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 750 XGL and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 750 XGL or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.