ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X vs Quadro4 750 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameNV25 A2Rage PRO
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 February 2002 (23 years ago)1 March 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors63 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm350 nm
Texture fill rate2.2000.08
ROPs81
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 2x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s600.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.16.0
OpenGL1.31.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 350 nm

Quadro4 750 XGL has an age advantage of 4 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 750 XGL and 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation graphics card while 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL
ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X
3D Rage PRO AGP 2X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 750 XGL or 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.