Quadro P3200 vs Quadro4 700 XGL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.99
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV25 A2GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 February 2002 (23 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed275 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors63 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2002 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

Quadro P3200 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 700 XGL and Quadro P3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 700 XGL is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL
Quadro4 700 XGL
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 700 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 341 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 700 XGL or Quadro P3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.