Radeon 530X Mobile vs Quadro4 550 XGL

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Polaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 February 2002 (22 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$176 $497

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed270 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.08024.58
Floating-point performanceno data784.1 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro4 550 XGL and Radeon 530X Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 19 February 2002 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 550 XGL and Radeon 530X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 550 XGL is a workstation card while Radeon 530X Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 550 XGL
Quadro4 550 XGL
AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
Radeon 530X Mobile

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 550 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.