Radeon RX 6400 vs Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.22
Power efficiencyno data27.14
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2004 (21 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed220 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistors29 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88 ×2111.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×232
TMUs4 ×248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB ×24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s ×2128.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2004 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 53 Watt

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has 194% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 400 NVS PCI and Radeon RX 6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2511 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 400 NVS PCI or Radeon RX 6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.