Radeon E9173 PCIe vs Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2004 (21 years ago)3 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed220 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors29 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88 ×239.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×216
TMUs4 ×232
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB ×22 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s ×248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2004 3 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has 94.4% lower power consumption.

E9173 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 400 NVS PCI and Radeon E9173 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E9173 PCIe is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe
Radeon E9173 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 30 votes

Rate Radeon E9173 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 400 NVS PCI or Radeon E9173 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.