Radeon 680M vs Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Power efficiencyno data13.69
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2004 (21 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed220 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors29 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88 ×2105.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×232
TMUs4 ×248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2004 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has 178% lower power consumption.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 400 NVS PCI and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1209 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 400 NVS PCI or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.