Radeon 550X vs Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.44
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2004 (21 years ago)27 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed220 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors29 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88 ×238.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×216
TMUs4 ×232
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB ×22 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s ×2112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2004 27 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Radeon 550X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 400 NVS PCI and Radeon 550X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 550X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
AMD Radeon 550X
Radeon 550X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 400 NVS PCI or Radeon 550X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.