Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Quadro4 200 NVS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.86
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 December 2003 (21 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data576
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x LFH60no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012_1
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro4 200 NVS has 36.4% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 9, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 200 NVS and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 200 NVS or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.