Radeon RX 560X vs Quadro4 200 NVS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.96
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Polaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 December 2003 (21 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed250 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1275 MHz
Number of transistors29 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00081.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Length168 mm170 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x LFH601x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro4 200 NVS has 581.8% lower power consumption.

RX 560X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 200 NVS and Radeon RX 560X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 200 NVS
Quadro4 200 NVS
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 441 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 200 NVS or Radeon RX 560X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.