ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs Quadro4 200 NVS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameNV17 A3R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 December 2003 (22 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors29 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0003.040
ROPs28
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x LFH601x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0 (9_0)
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 47 Watt

Quadro4 200 NVS has an age advantage of 9 months, and 327% lower power consumption.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 200 NVS and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 200 NVS or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.