GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Quadro2 MXR Low Profile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated163
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.25
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV11 B2GA106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2000 (24 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed200 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors20 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8142.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.098 gflops
ROPs432
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed183 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth2.928 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2000 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 8 GB has an age advantage of 21 year, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro2 MXR Low Profile and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro2 MXR Low Profile is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Quadro2 MXR Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 11680 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.