Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU vs Quadro T400 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU117no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release dateno data30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89640
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate79.80no data
Floating-point processing power2.554 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10 GB/s8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

T400 Mobile has 150% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T400 Mobile and M4 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T400 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T400 Mobile
Quadro T400 Mobile
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
M4 Max 40-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Quadro T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 25 votes

Rate M4 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T400 Mobile or M4 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.