Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.44no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed1575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate114.240.80
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6424
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 384SP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 483 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 35 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T2000 Mobile or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.