Radeon 540 Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.68no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Lexa
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)26 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1575 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate114.235.97
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 26 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

T2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

540 Mobile, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon 540 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 540 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon 540 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 395 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate Radeon 540 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.