RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.05no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10249728
Core clock speed1575 MHz1425 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2643.0
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS41.15 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs64304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt

T2000 Mobile has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T2000 Mobile and RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 381 vote

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.