Radeon RX 640 OEM vs Quadro T1000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.22no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)9 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed1395 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data51.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.658 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 9 April 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX 640 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

We couldn't decide between Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX 640 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 640 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX 640 OEM
Radeon RX 640 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 371 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.